Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake Pads

Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake Pads

Marsoni

M251S

$166.49

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake PadsHigh Performance Street disc brake pads are legendary for increasing stopping power on street legal vehicles. Increasing the performance of your vehicles braking system is easy when you choose Hawk Performances HPS braking compound. The High Performance Street compound offers a higher coefficient of friction over stock brake pads and can provide you 20 to 40 percent more stopping power and higher resistance to brake fade than most standard replacement

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake Pads orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake Pads ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake Pads, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Hawk 1998-2/2002 Subaru Forester L (w/Rear Drum Brakes) High Perf. Street 5.0 Front Brake Pads in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Nice product. With adhesive applied, this an all in one product. Easily cut to random shapes and dimensions and the adhesive seems to hold well. Removing the paper that protects the adhesive to apply in tight areas, presents a new set of problems. Having applied the product inside the panels of an old Trooper, it is yet to be determine if sound and temperature transfer are reduced.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2026

Verified Purchase

Cecil stevens

San Leandro, US

★★★★★ 5

This is very easy to install works very well

Material Type: 157mil Closed Cell Foam, Style: 157 mil 36 SqFt

Very well made installs very easily and insulates my truck well

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026

Verified Purchase

Matt Boschen

San Leandro, US

★★★★★ 5

Just Right! Made in the Ukraine!

Material Type: 157mil Closed Cell Foam, Style: 157 mil 36 SqFt, Material Type: 157mil Closed Cell Foam, Style: 157 mil 36 SqFt

Great product! I doubled this up with Siless Sound Dampening material as well. I did a double layer of this insulation on the ceiling (same as in your home, more insulation up top) and single throughout the rest of the car, in my effort to turn my CUV into an interior camper for winter snow storm chasing! Looks great, easy to install, and I got to support the Ukraine! (I was leaning towards Kilmat products but they are made in the Russian Federation... with everything going on right now, it was a no brainer) Only downsides is (1) that you need to be really careful while handling it, because the stickiness WILL stick, (to your fingers) and if you handle it too much, you will pull some of that off. As long as you are careful there, you will be ok. (I personally cut the pieces to size/ smaller the better for tight spaces/ putting up behind other lines/hoses in the car... and then for the 2nd layer, I made sure I overlapped the seams so that there was no gap where the heat would escape through). Second Downside (2) is that I need a little bit more, but not a whole roll more worth... 50 sq ft would be better for what I needed it for, but whatever - I am being nitpicky at this point. Overall, Great Product/Looks Great/ I HIGHLY Recommend!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2022